Female animals were once deemed too hormonal and messy for science. Some scientists warn it’s not enough to just use more female lab rats.Hormones in female research subjects have long been blamed for creating “messy” lab results. “Everything is measured to the male scale,” said one neurobiologist.CreditHulton Archive/Getty Images By JoAnna Klein May 30, 2019 Say you are prescribed medication for depression, anxiety or even just to sleep. Would you want to take it if you knew that the drug had only been tested on men and male animals? Rebecca Shansky, a neuroscientist at Northeastern University in Boston, thinks you might not . When she tells nonscientific audiences that researchers “for the most part don’t study female animals, people are blown away,” she said. She added: “It seems like such an obvious thing to a normal person. But when you come up in the academic and science world, it’s like, ‘Oh no, females are so complicated, so we just don’t s...
By Juliet Newbigin IN THIS ISSUE of New Associations we hope to introduce you to some of the work of the BPC’s task group which was set up to consider ways of making the profession more open and welcoming to gay, lesbian and bisexual people. I imagine that some readers will wonder why this was necessary. The ban on acceptance of gay and lesbian candidates for psychoanalytic training on the grounds of their sexual orientation is surely a thing of the past? All member organisations are now bound by the Equality Act, and have signed up to the Position Statement that the BPC adopted in 2012, which stated that: The British Psychoanalytic Council opposes discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. It does not accept that a homosexual orientation is evidence of disturbance of the mind or in development. Might this be another symptom of the unstoppable march of political correctness, which will lead to an intrusive policing of psychoanalytic training organisations? So why d...
Comments
Post a Comment